U.S. Geological Survey, National Biological Information Infrastr, 2008, Midwinter Bald Eagle Counts, 1986-2005 (update 2008):.Online Links:
Karen Steenhof, Laura Bond, Kirk K. Bates, and Lynda , 2002, Trends in midwinter counts of bald eagles in the contiguous United States, 1986-2000: Bird Populations 6:21-32.
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | undetermined minimum |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Units: | percent |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | undetermined minimum |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Units: | percent |
| Formal codeset | |
|---|---|
| Codeset Name: | Bird Conservation Region Codes <http://www.nabci-us.org/aboutnabci/bcrdescrip.pdf> |
| Codeset Source: | North American Bird Conservation Initiative |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| East Coast | NEW_ENGLAND/MID-ATLANTIC_COAST; SOUTHEASTERN_COASTAL_PLAIN |
| Eastern Woodland | APPALACHIAN_MOUNTAINS; ATLANTIC_NORTHERN_FOREST; CENTRAL_HARDWOODS; PIEDMONT |
| Great Basin | GREAT_BASIN; SIERRA_NEVADA |
| Great Lakes | BOREAL_HARDWOOD_TRANSITION; LOWER_GREAT_LAKES/_ST._LAWRENCE_PLAIN; PRAIRIE_HARDWOOD_TRANSITION |
| Gulf | GULF_COASTAL_PRAIRIE; MISSISSIPPI_ALLUVIAL_VALLEY; OAKS_AND_PRAIRIES; WEST_GULF_COASTAL_PLAIN/OUACHITAS |
| Pac Coast | COASTAL_CALIFORNIA; NORTHERN_PACIFIC_RAINFOREST |
| Prairie | BADLANDS_AND_PRAIRIES; CENTRAL_MIXED_GRASS_PRAIRIE; EASTERN_TALLGRASS_PRAIRIE; EDWARDS_PLATEAU; PRAIRIE_POTHOLES; SHORTGRASS_PRAIRIE |
| Rockies | NORTHERN_ROCKIES; SOUTHERN_ROCKIES/COLORADO_PLATEAU |
| SW Desert | CHIHUAHUAN DESERT; SIERRA MADRE OCCIDENTAL; SONORAN_AND_MOJAVE_DESERTS |
| Formal codeset | |
|---|---|
| Codeset Name: | BCRIndex |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | unknown |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | unknown |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | unknown |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | unknown |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | unknown |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | unknown |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| High | Area meets criteria in definition |
| Low | Area does not meet criteria in definition |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| NorthWest | |
| NorthEast | |
| SouthWest | |
| SouthEast |
A unique alphanumeric string identifying the route within each state; note that alphanumeric codes are unique within states; some states may use the same sitenumb.
| Formal codeset | |
|---|---|
| Codeset Source: | Federal Information Processing Standard, Pub 5-2 <http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip5-2.htm> |
| Formal codeset | |
|---|---|
| Codeset Source: | Federal Information Processing Standard, Pub 5-2 <http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/fip5-2.htm> |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 1 |
| Maximum: | 15 |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | Clear |
| 2 | Foggy then clearing |
| 3 | Foggy |
| 4 | Partly cloudy |
| 5 | Cloudy then clearing |
| 6 | Cloudy |
| 7 | Not listed |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | Yes |
| 2 | No |
| 3 | Assumed complete |
| 4 | Not surveyed |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | No; fog not present |
| 2 | Yes; foggy conditions |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | Much less than normal |
| 2 | Less than normal |
| 3 | Normal |
| 4 | More than normal |
| 5 | Much more than normal |
| 6 | Not listed |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 20 |
| Maximum: | 50 |
| Units: | degrees |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | -130 |
| Maximum: | -60 |
| Units: | degrees |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| air | if any part of it was done aerially |
| water | if a boat was used for all or part of the survey |
| ground | if planes, boats, and helicopters were NOT used. Ground surveys included foot, vehicle, skis, and snowmobile |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| AIRCRAFT | |
| AIRCRAFT & BOAT | |
| AIRCRAFT & FOOT | |
| ATV | |
| BIKE | |
| BOAT | |
| BOAT & ATV | |
| BOAT & FOOT | |
| FIXED POINT | |
| FIXED WING | |
| FOOT | |
| FOOT & RAILROAD | |
| FOOT & SNOWMOBILE | |
| HELICOPTER | |
| MULTIPLE (>2) | |
| RAILROAD | |
| SKIS | |
| SKIS/SNOWSHOES | |
| SNOWMOBILE | |
| SNOWMOBILE & OTHER | |
| UNKNOWN | |
| VEHICLE | |
| VEHICLE & AIRCRAFT | |
| VEHICLE & AIRCRAFT & BOAT | |
| VEHICLE & AIRCRAFT & BOAT & FOOT | |
| VEHICLE & AIRCRAFT & FOOT | |
| VEHICLE & ATV | |
| VEHICLE & BOAT | |
| VEHICLE & BOAT & FOOT | |
| VEHICLE & BOAT & SNOWMOBILE | |
| VEHICLE & FIXED POINT | |
| VEHICLE & FOOT | |
| VEHICLE & FOOT & ATV | |
| VEHICLE & FOOT & RAILROAD | |
| VEHICLE & FOOT & SNOWMOBILE | |
| VEHICLE & OTHER | |
| VEHICLE & SKIS | |
| VEHICLE & SNOWMOBILE | |
| VEHICLE, FIXED WING & SNOWMOBILE |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 1 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Units: | miles |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 1 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 1 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | 100 |
| Units: | percent |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | No |
| 2 | Yes |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | None |
| 2 | Snowy |
| 3 | Rainy |
| 4 | Not listed |
unbounded list of river basins
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| RO | Known night roosting area |
| NR | Non-roosting area |
| BO | Both roosting and non-roosting areas |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| CO | Continuous route |
| FP | Fixed point |
| BO | Both continuous and fixed point routes |
unbounded list of names
A unique alphanumeric string identifying the route within each state; note that alphanumeric codes are unique within states; some states may use the same sitenumb
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0-17 km (0-10 miles) |
| 2 | 18-56 km (11-35 miles) |
| 3 | 57-120 km (36-75 miles) |
| 4 | more than 120 km (>75 miles) |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| yes (Y) | Some ice present |
| no (N) | No ice present |
list of state names
list of state names
date field (Microsoft format)
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | undetermined minimum |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Units: | degrees, Fahrenheit |
variable time formats
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 0 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 1 |
| Maximum: | undetermined maximum |
| Units: | minute |
| Resolution: | 1 |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| 1 | Very mild |
| 2 | Mild |
| 3 | Normal |
| 4 | Harsh |
| 5 | Very harsh |
| 6 | Not listed |
| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| LW | Light; 1-7 mph |
| MW | Moderate; 8-18 mph |
| NL | Not listed |
| NW | No wind; calm |
| SW | Strong; >18 mph |
| Range of values | |
|---|---|
| Minimum: | 1986 |
| Maximum: | 2005 |
Early development of the database was done by the National Wildlife Federation. The Bureau of Land Management supported development from 1991 - 1993 and the National Biological Survey (now USGS-BRD) continued support from 1993-1996.
(541) 750-1030 (voice)
Initial objectives were to determine eagle distribution during winter, identify previously unrecognized areas of important winter habitat, and estimate the wintering Bald Eagle population in the lower 48 states. The current purpose of the midwinter bald eagle count is to estimate national and regional Bald Eagle count trends overall and by age class.
Because survey routes were not randomly selected, we do not know if the standard routes used in this analysis are representative of the contiguous 48 states. Our findings are likely biased towards states and portions of states where agencies and individuals were committed to long-term, consistent data collection. Within those areas, our sampling has emphasized river stretches and water bodies where Bald Eagles are known to occur. The survey, therefore, represents a type of ""convenience sampling"" and is subject to inferential constraints outlined by Anderson (2001). The midwinter counts cannot be used to estimate actual population size, and inferences about trends must be restricted to the areas sampled by survey routes.
We received more than 15,000 reports of surveys conducted from 1986 to 2005. We reviewed all survey forms to ensure that the number of eagles reported in each age class tracked with the total number reported. We excluded surveys from the analysis if: (1) the count was conducted before 1 Jan or after 25 Jan; (2) the route covered was inconsistent from year to year; (3) the route was not described clearly enough to determine if it was similar to other years; (4) the survey method was not listed; or (5) we were unable to obtain information on size of the survey route. We tried to verify that route coverage was consistent from year to year by comparing reported mileages among years. In many cases, we contacted observers and state coordinators to verify starting and ending points as well as total area surveyed. We corrected or eliminated records when we became aware of cases where observers covered areas less than or greater than the defined standard route. We only used data from routes that were surveyed consistently in at least 4 years where at least 4 eagles were counted in a single year. Survey routes with <4 eagle observations/year are probably in marginal or unsuitable wintering habitat; including data from routes where few or no eagles were ever seen would have biased our trend estimates towards zero. We evaluated count data to determine if fog, precipitation, or changing transportation methods might have affected the ability of observers to detect eagles and thereby influence trend estimates. Based on our evaluation, we excluded surveys that used a different transportation method on a particular route in a minority of years, but we included surveys conducted during fog or precipitation. After all exclusions, our final data set includes 178,896 observations of eagles during 8,674 surveys of 746 routes in 43 states.
Our analyses indicated that we could not use a survey route in the trend analysis if the method of survey (air, ground, water) changed. So if we have 10 years of aerial survey on a given route and 1 year of ground survey, we have to throw out the ground survey. However, if we have at least 4 years of aerial surveys and at least 4 years of ground surveys (different years than the aerial surveys), we have considered them as separate routes and use both of them in the analysis.
Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
- Access_Constraints: None
- Use_Constraints: None
(541) 750-1030 (voice)
Downloadable Data
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the accuracy or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data and aggregate use with other data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly acquired from a U.S. Geological Survey server, and not indirectly through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. It is also strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with these data. The U.S. Geological Survey shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.
Available online at: <http://ocid.nacse.org/nbii/eagles/>
(541) 750-1030 (voice)