Barred Owl and Spotted Owl Hybridization - Genetic Data

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
Susan M. Haig, Thomas D. Mullins, Eric D. Forsman, Pepper W. Trail and Liv Wennerberg
Publication_Date: 2004
Title: Barred Owl and Spotted Owl Hybridization - Genetic Data
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular data
Larger_Work_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
Susan M. Haig, Thomas D. Mullins, Eric D. Forsman, Pepper W. Trail and Liv Wennerberg
Publication_Date: In Press
Title:
Genetic identification of barred owls, spotted owls, and their hybrids: legal implications of hybrid identity
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Description:
Abstract:
These data are in the form of ASCII text files containing mitochondrial control region sequences and amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP) band frequencies for spotted owls, barred owls, and spotted-barred owl hybrids. Sampling areas were in the northwestern United States.
Purpose:
Population expansion of barred owls into the western United States represents a harmful impact on the threatened Northern spotted owl. Since these species hybridize, there is a legal need under the Endangered Species Act to determine the forensic distinction among these species and their hybrids. Thus, we used molecular markers to address this need.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2004
Currentness_Reference: date of laboratory analysis
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent: Field sampling was conducted in the northwestern United States.
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -124
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -121
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 46
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 42
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: Biocomplexity Thesaurus
Theme_Keyword: Genetics
Theme_Keyword: Population differentiation
Theme_Keyword: Mitochondrial DNA
Theme_Keyword: Hybridization
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: mtDNA
Theme_Keyword: Endangered Species Act
Theme_Keyword: Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Theme_Keyword: AFLP
Theme_Keyword: Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis
Taxonomy:
Keywords/Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: Biocomplexity Thesaurus
Taxonomic_Keywords: birds
Keywords/Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Taxonomic_Keywords: spotted owl
Taxonomic_Keywords: barred owl
Taxonomic_System:
Classification_System/Authority:
Classification_System_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) , United States Geological Survey (USGS), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , Agriculture Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), National Museum of Natural History (NMNH)
Publication_Date: 1999
Title: Intergrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: web site
Online_Linkage: <http://www.itis.usda.gov>
Identification_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Hamer, T. E., E. D. Forsman, A. D. Fuchs, and M. L. Walters.
Publication_Date: 1996
Title: Hybridization between barred and Spotted Owls.
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Auk
Issue_Identification: 111:487-492
Taxonomic_Procedures:
Initial taxonomic identification of spotted owls was based on plumage attributes and vocalizations documented by field biologists during long term monitoring of spotted owl populations. Presumed hybrids were identified in the field by plumage, vocalizations, and morphological measurements as described by Hamer et al. 1996, or by species identification of both parents.
Taxonomic_Completeness:
In addition we examined tissues samples from three potential hybrids, for which taxonomic status was unresloved by field biologists.
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Sub Phylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aves
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Strigiformes
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Strigidae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Strix
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Strix varia
Applicable_Common_Name: barred owl
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Strix occidentalis
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Sub Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Strix occidentalis caurina
Applicable_Common_Name: Northern spotted owl
Access_Constraints:
Due to the federally threatened status of the northern spotted owl, data involving specific collection location are not generally available.
Use_Constraints:
Data use (except that deal with specific sample location) may be granted on a case by case basis from data set originator.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Haig, Susan M.
Contact_Organization:
US Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 3200 SW Jefferson Way
City: Corvallis
State_or_Province: OR
Postal_Code: 97331
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (541) 750-7482
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (541) 758-8806
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: susan_haig@usgs.gov
Data_Set_Credit:
Funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, the U.S. Geological Survey Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, and the U.S. Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report: No tests for attribute accuracy were conducted.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Sequences were bidirectionally sequenced to insure sequences of high quality.

DNA was amplified from single extractions to minimize variation in DNA quality and concentration. Negative controls were run to prevent scoring artifact bands.

Completeness_Report: Low quality DNA samples were eliminated from the analyses.
Lineage:
Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Lab
Methodology_Identifier:
Methodology_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Methodology_Keyword: mtDNA
Methodology_Keyword: ALFP
Methodology_Description:
Mitochondrial Control Region Sequence Data DNA from a 524 bp portion of the mitochondrial control region (D-loop) was sequenced for Barred Owls, hybrids, and potential hybrids. DNA sequences from the same region in Spotted Owls (Haig et al. 2004) were also included in analyses. The control region was amplified by PCR on a PCT 100 thermal cycler (MJ Research), using the primers N1 and D16 (Barrowclough et al. 1999). The following parameters were used for amplification: 2 min denaturation at 94 ºC, followed by 35 cycles of 94 ºC for 30 sec, 50 ºC for 30 sec and 72 ºC for 1 min, and a final elongation at 72 ºC for 10 min. The PCR product was cleaned and concentrated by centrifugation dialysis using Microcon 30,000 MW filters (Amicon Bioseparations). Internal primers D11 (Barrowclough et al. 1999) and BO24 (5’-TGATATAGGAACCAGAGGC-3’) were used to generate bi-directional continuous DNA sequence of domain I through a portion of domain II in the control region. Sequencing was performed on an ABI Prism 3100 automatic DNA sequencer, using ABI Primers, and the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing v2.0 Ready Reaction kit. Sequences were run at the Central Services Laboratory at Oregon State University. Sequences were aligned manually using BioEdit 5.0.1 (Hall 1999). Haplotype diversity (h) and nucleotide diversity (p) was calculated using DnaSP (Rozas & Rozas 1999). Genetic variation was further analyzed in Arlequin 2.001 (Schneider et al. 2000), calculating haplotype frequencies, number of transitions, transversions, indels, and average pairwise sequence divergences within and between species. The program PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) was used to estimate phylogenetic relationships using maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood criteria and the neighbor-joining approach. Trees were generated using 100 replicate heuristic searches with random taxon addition (10 replicates). Reliability of support for tree nodes was assessed for each method by bootstrap consensus (100 replicates; Felsenstein 1985). Likelihood ratio tests were implemented in the program Modeltest v3.06 (Posada & Crandall 1998) to determine the optimum minimum parameter maximum likelihood model. The hierarchical likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion selected the Tamura-Nei (1993) model of substitution plus gamma (TrN + I + G); gamma shaped parameter 0.1916 with " = 0.1426 estimated from the data. Neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood trees were constructed in PAUP using the parameter estimates described above. All trees were unrooted.

Amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses Amplified fragment length polymorphism analyses were carried out according to Vos et al. (1995) with some modifications. In short, 0.5 µg genomic DNA was incubated for 1 hour at 37 ºC with 5 units Eco RI and 10 units Mse I in 20 µL reaction buffer ‘REact3’ (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) and 50 ng/µL BSA. Thereafter, a cocktail was added to this mixture containing 2.5 pmol Eco RI adapter (Vos et al. 1995), 25 pmol Mse I adapter (Vos et al. 1995), 0.5 µL 10 x T4 DNA ligation buffer (Promega), 0.5 unit T4 DNAligase (Promega), and dH2O to a total volume of 5 µL. Incubation was continued for 3 hours at 37 ºC. The reaction mixture was diluted tenfold in dH2O.

Preamplification PCR was performed with Eco RI primer ET (5’-GACTGCGTACCAATTCT-3’) and Mse I primer MC (5’-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAAC-3’), using the following temperature profile: 94 ºC for 2 min, followed by 20 cycles of 94 ºC for 30 sec, 56 ºC for 30 sec and 72 ºC for 1 min and a final elongation at 72 ºC for 10 min. The preamplification PCR product was diluted tenfold and stored at -20 ºC. In the second selective amplification, the PCR included 94 ºC for 2 min, a 12 cycle touchdown procedure of 94 ºC for 30 sec, 60 ºC - 0.7 ºC/cycle for 30 sec and 72 ºC for 1 min followed by 23 cycles of 94 ºC for 30 sec, 56 ºC for 30 sec, 72 ºC for 1 min, and elongation at 72 ºC for 10 min. Primers with three selective nucleotides were used in four combinations: ETAG*/MCGA, ETAG*/MCTG, ETCT */MCGA and ETCT */MCTG. The Eco RI primers (E) were labeled with FAM at the 5’-end. The PCR products were run on 5% polyacrylamide gels for 4 hours on an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) using filter set A. All samples were run with an internal lane standard (2500 Rox). Amplified fragment length polymorphism data were analyzed using GeneScan 3.1.2 and Genotyper 2.5. The choice of specific markers (bands) was based on their utility for species and hybrid identification. Initially, ten individuals of each species were screened for suitable markers. Markers with the most pronounced differences in frequency between the two species were selected and scored for all individuals. DNA from toe pads of museum specimens showed clear patterns of degraded DNA (few and short bands only) and were excluded from further AFLP analyses. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms were scored for presence or absence of the selected bands. Results of all bands were also pooled into a principle coordinate analysis (PCO) using MultiVariate Statistical Package 3.0 (1998, Kovach Computing Services, Anglesey, Wales; <http://www.kovcomp.co.uk/mvsp/index.html>). Thus, genetic variability of sampled individuals was summarized into a few major components (PCO1, PCO2, etc). The Doh assignment test (Paetkau et al. 1995, 1997) was used for species assignments based on presence/absence of bands. Further, assignment scores were used to indicate the likelihood that an individual was assigned to a certain species (according to Doh assignment calculator). Differences in likelihood scores between Spotted Owls and Barred Owls reflected how much more likely it was that an individual was assigned to Barred Owl than to Spotted Owl, or vice versa.

Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Haig, S. M., T. D. Mullins, and E. D. Forsman
Publication_Date: in press
Title:
Subspecific relationships and genetic structure in the Spotted Owl
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Conservation Genetics
Issue_Identification: 5:in press
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Barrowclough, G. F., R. J. Gutiérrez, and J. G. Groth
Publication_Date: 1999
Title:
Phylogeography of Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) populations based on mitochondrial DNA sequences: gene flow, genetic structure, and a novel biogeographic pattern
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Evolution
Issue_Identification: 53: 919-931.
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Hall, T.A.
Publication_Date: 1999
Title:
BioEdit: a user- friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Nucleic Acids Symposium Series
Issue_Identification: 41:95-98
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Rozas, J., and R. Rozas
Publication_Date: 1999
Title:
DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Bioinformatics
Issue_Identification: 15:174-175
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Schneider, S., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier
Publication_Date: 2000
Title:
Arlequin ver. 2.000: A software for population genetics data analysis
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: book
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Geneva, Switzerland.
Publisher: Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Swofford, D. L.
Publication_Date: 2002
Title: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP*), version 4.0b9
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: book
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Washington, D.C.
Publisher: Smithsonian Institution
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Felsenstein, J.
Publication_Date: 1985
Title:
Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Evolution
Issue_Identification: 39:783-791
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall
Publication_Date: 1998
Title: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Bioinformatics
Issue_Identification: 14:817-818
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Tamura, K., and M. Nei
Publication_Date: 1993
Title:
Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Molecular Biology and Evolution
Issue_Identification: 10:512-526
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zebeau
Publication_Date: 1995
Title: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Nucleic Acids Research
Issue_Identification: 23:4407-4414
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
Paetkau, D., L. P. Waits, P. L. Clarkson, L., Craighead, and C. Strobeck
Publication_Date: 1994
Title:
An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations.
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Genetics
Issue_Identification: 147:1943-1957
Process_Step:
Process_Description: No processing, original data collection
Process_Date: Unknown

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: mtDNA_data
Entity_Type_Definition: ASCII file containing mitochondrial DNA sequences
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: Dataset developer
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: lab_id
Attribute_Definition: Laboratory identification number for each sample
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of identification numbers
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: location
Attribute_Definition: Locational information
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
The form of this information varies from gps coordinates to legal descriptions. This is a text field.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: region
Attribute_Definition: Geographic region where organism was sampled
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of region names
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: sequence
Attribute_Definition: DNA sequence
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
An indeterminant string of letters A, C, T, and G to represent the DNA sequence.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: species
Attribute_Definition: Species of organism
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of species names
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: state
Attribute_Definition: State where organism was sampled
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Codeset_Domain:
Codeset_Name:
FIPS 5.2 Codes for the Identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the Outlying Areas of the United States, and Associated Areas
Codeset_Source:
Federal Infomation Processing Standard <http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/by-num.htm>
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: subspecies
Attribute_Definition: Sub species of organism
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of sub species
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: aflp_data
Entity_Type_Definition:
ASCII text file containing amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis data
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: Data set developer
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: bands
Attribute_Definition: ALFP sequence repeat
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequence of (+) and (-) indicating presence or absence of bands representing gene groups
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: id
Attribute_Definition: Laboratory identifier
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of unique indentification numbers
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: species
Attribute_Definition: Species of organism
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of species names
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: subspecies
Attribute_Definition: Sub species of organism
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: List of sub species names

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20040706
Metadata_Review_Date: 20040713
Metadata_Future_Review_Date:
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Forest and Rangeland Ecosystems Science Center (FRESC) Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (FRESC)
Contact_Person: Metadata Coordinator
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing and Physical Address
Address:
777 NW 9th St Suite 400
City: Corvallis
State_or_Province: Oregon
Postal_Code: 97330
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 541-750-1030
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 541-750-1069
Metadata_Standard_Name:
FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999

Generated by mp version 2.8.10 on Fri Sep 24 08:43:53 2004